Over the long term, spindles bear the brunt of punishment meted out by day-to-day machining forces. For metalworking professionals, spindle failures are among the most costly and disruptive events that occur in the course of daily operations. The proliferation of enclosed and guarded machines that incorporate high pressure coolant delivery systems exacerbates the difficult conditions to which spindles have traditionally been exposed.
The conventional means of protecting precision spindle bearings from contamination is to continuously purge pressurized air through labyrinth-type bearing seals during operation. In the past, it has been assumed that, simply by maintaining sufficient air-pressure through the spindle, this contamination would be prevented. The laws of physics, however, dictate some shortcomings to this approach that can lead to nagging failures, particularly under extremely demanding machining conditions.
North America's largest independent spindle builder, SETCO (Cincinnati, Ohio), made a decision in 1996 to address the problems of contamination and early failure. Through extensive research involving more than 4,000 individual tests, SETCO determined that unequal air pressure-caused by the location of ports around the circumference of a spindle's seals--creates adjacent zones of high and low pressure inside the seal. As a result, coolant--the primary cause of bearing failure--is driven from high-pressure to low-pressure zones. In effect, this phenomenon causes coolant to be sucked into the bearings. This can occur during machining or when the bearings cool down between machining operations. Under these conditions, increasing the air pressure cannot solve the problem. In fact, higher air pressure only makes the problem worse.
As a solution to this dilemma, SETCO developed the AirShield line of spindles. These products incorporate a proprietary, tangential air-purge system that equalizes pressure around the seal but does not inhibit bearing lubrication. Performance maps generated during the manufacturer's testing illustrate this pressure equalization. Tests revealed that internal pressures of the AirShield products varied within a maximum range of only 10 percent of the total pressure, compared to a typical 40-percent variation when standard labyrinth seals were tested.
No comments:
Post a Comment